<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tech Trip &#187; Search Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tech-trip.com/index.php/category/search-engines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tech-trip.com</link>
	<description>Technology Notepad..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:12:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>search engine innovation?</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-trip.com/general-technology/search-engine-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tech-trip.com/general-technology/search-engine-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distribution of content search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[need a change in how search engines look at content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search engine innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech-trip.com/index.php/2009/12/search-engine-innovation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[search engine innovation - next phase for search engines]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While taking a smoke break, I was just thinking what is really missing with the search engines (definitely not underestimating the current search engines &#8211; Google is just great, I can&#8217;t even now think of living with it) and a very quick answer that I came up with was that the search engines now search for content / keywords on a very macro level through the resultant websites (maybe that&#8217;s what the idea of a search engine is), but is the idea efficient enough? Is that how people want the information or results to be?</p>
<p>A little half baked concept that I&#8217;d like to share below (information below is totally incomplete and maybe not easily understandable, I&#8217;ll soon update and put some sense to it) -</p>
<p>Search basic keyword / industry / category + Supporting words = most known category / industry searched phrase results</p>
<p>Thoughts &#8211; search type or expected result type &#8211; company information, content information, etc</p>
<p>1- search for the above custom built phrase<br />
2- search from the most searched phrases for that category<br />
3- search random (beta) &#8211; why this should be beta is because this should be built over time, as people search for keywords and our smart system logics with them and keeps building a criteria based dictionary</p>
<p>*updated march &#8211; just noticed, the article says it was written in dec 09, whereas I think I wrote this in feb, 2010. Interesting, I&#8217;ll need to check if its Wordmobi that&#8217;s showing the date incorrect or my mobile / laptop clock that had gone bonkers, or maybe even my servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tech-trip.com/general-technology/search-engine-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
